![]() |
Film poster |
Un Chien Andalou (1929) - Luis Buñuel
A landmark of early cinema, An Andalusian Dog was a surrealist film directed by Luis Bunuel with involvement from Salvador Dali. Although it was only about 15 minutes long, many images from the film still have cultural relevance today and are immediately recognizable. Combining elements of Freudian psychoanalysis and bizarre imagery, the film is an abstract exploration of the director's subconscious. There is no clear plot or message to the film, as it instead focuses on creating a purely visual experience.
Signs without ideology?
On the surface, the various images in the film seem to be totally meaningless and nonsensical, grouped together at random. However, within the film itself there is a consistent internal logic that governs the events within. While physical space and material reality can bend and be altered without much effort, the internal logic cannot be opposed as easily. Essentially, the only eternal and unifying aspect of the film is that it is pure ideology: the product of the subconscious mind itself.
The film's opening scene is that of a man sharpening a razor, then cutting open the eye of a sitting woman. This scene thus sets the tone for the rest of the film by demonstrating the truly visceral power of ideology. Ideology can render violence and destruction completely meaningless by simply refusing to acknowledge that it even occurred, as the woman shows no signs of the incident later on in the film and no other references are made to the opening scene. This physicality is reflected throughout the film in the overarching tone of death and decay.
Semiotic entanglement
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjuc0X-Ff3_Aje7l9tVQa2ZGmswqtmsyGo4lVCnXSN48IFlCNMFQz8xwAo8npcgzAC1nsewgU-CS-9EtbrGRMm0jRDRu_CB7wWrWxPBtaxwR0gtXO95iFJeA6cgNzKOvjES5vr6rkj1K8/s1600/Pierre_Batcheff_in_un_chien_andalou.jpg)
Conclusion
While the film may be unorthodox in many respects, it is a wholly unique experience that has deeply resonant commentary (intended or not) on the nature of reality, symbols and society. Its dreamlike nature is the result of its surrealist origin and the means by which it challenges the audience is something to be lauded. When viewed as an exploration of a parallel ideology with its own internal logic, the film's meaning becomes much more clear. The ultimate result of the film is an intended confusion, one that forcibly makes the viewer question his or her understanding of the authenticity of their own experiences in the ideology they are immersed in.
No comments:
Post a Comment